What does an H100-hour actually rent for?
There is no single H100 price. The same GPU-hour clears from ~$1.8 on marketplaces to $12+ at big clouds — a 2–7× spread that any one-source number hides. KH100 prints the stratified composite of the three tiers the market actually clears at, the dispersion between them, and the committed-tenor curve — daily, from a self-archived book of ~600 offers, with Ornn's transacted index printed beside as the cross-check.
The composite since July 2026, with the GetDeploying weekly spine (tier-B-only, labeled) extending context back to January 2025. Base day 2026-07-03 = 100, constants frozen.
Today's tier medians, with the transacted cross-check and the inside spread of the big-cloud book.
Neocloud provider-median $/hr by commitment — spot to 36 months, from the archived GetDeploying weekly ladder. Almost nobody publishes this curve; it's where scarcity expectations live.
A — big-cloud on-demand median via gpuhunt (AWS/GCP/OCI/Lambda + 4 more, ~600 H100 offers/day). B — GetDeploying neocloud list median (~40 providers). C — marketplace clearing: geomean of Vast.ai asks (full explicit-query pool, verification-tiered) and Akash on-chain leases. The full per-offer book is archived daily — the index is reconstructable from raw offers.
Fixed-weight geometric mean of tier relatives, base day 2026-07-03 = 100 ($4.19 / $2.8725 / $1.9384 — frozen v0, never restated; changes version). Pre-period context is a tier-B-only weekly spine back to Jan 2025, rebased to join at 100 and labeled as such.
Per-leg carry-last-good ≤ 14 days, else the print suspends. Ornn transacted and CCIR reference rates are cross-checks, never inputs. Measurement upgrades (Vast full-pool query, 2026-08-30) are documented splices, not silent restatements. Full spec in the KOPS methodology annex.
Three tiers, one composite, the spread printed beside it — daily, from raw archived offers.